In a lake, light intensity decreases by \(12\%\) for each meter of water depth.
a) Explain the relationship between the percent decrease and the decay factor \(b\). Find \(b\) for this situation.
b) At the surface, the light intensity is \(100\%\). Find the remaining intensity at depths of \(2\,\text{m}\), \(5\,\text{m}\), and \(10\,\text{m}\).
c) A diver claims, “If the intensity decreases by \(12\%\) per meter, then at \(5\,\text{m}\) it has decreased by \(60\%\) in all.” Evaluate the claim mathematically.
Hints
- What percent remains after removing \(12\%\)?
- Each decrease is based on the newly reduced value.
- Compare repeated exponential decay with simply multiplying \(12\%\) by the number of meters.
Solution
1. After a \(12\%\) decrease, \(88\%\) remains, so the decay factor is \(b=1-0.12=0.88\).
2. The percent intensity at depth \(d\) is \(I(d)=100(0.88)^d\).
3. \(I(2)=77.44\%\), \(I(5)\approx52.77\%\), and \(I(10)\approx27.85\%\).
4. The diver's claim is false because the \(12\%\) decrease is applied to the remaining intensity at each meter, not repeatedly to the original amount. At \(5\,\text{m}\), about \(52.77\%\) remains, so the total decrease is about \(47.23\%\), not \(60\%\).
Answer
a) \(b=0.88\); the factor is the fraction that remains after each \(12\%\) decrease.
b) \(2\,\text{m}\): \(77.44\%\); \(5\,\text{m}\): about \(52.77\%\); \(10\,\text{m}\): about \(27.85\%\)
c) The claim is false. The total decrease after \(5\,\text{m}\) is about \(47.23\%\).